Sunday, October 28, 2012

Reason against any scriptures

 We  rationalists find  the  putative  biblical metaphors  blaspheme  reason and -humanity! Michael  Ruse  harms the cause of rationalism with his saccharine  accommodationist to Christ-insanity with  claiming that, why, yes , Christians can  use science to affirm their beliefs. Yet, as the previous article  observes, the metaphors  do not reflect reality. Why then  would any  rational person even try to find those  life-enhancing  metaphors  for  the hope that ahughty John Haught claims  reverberates in  the Bible?
     No good metaphor can explain the Deluge: the real metaphor stands for might is right!
       We can find excellent metaphors elsewhere. Why, Aesop's Fables enlighten us.
      Why would any rational person find Yahweh's irrational outbursts of any sue for a food metaphors?  That egregious anthology  reflects the misanthropes who wrote it. As the author notes, in effect,  Why would any rational person care fro their barbarism?
        We need no God to  underwrite  morality  and  to punish  erratically.
          Neither Yahweh nor Allah or Ormazd  exist .
          We rationalist s have the duty then to  mock  all that  effect of superstition!
           No errantist can defend that anthology as having any divine verbiage anyway. Why then assume that other scriptures aren't just as authoritative? But,no, inclusivists who allege such, gloss over the differences  with their reverence of the Holy. No rational person should think that  any God had anything to do with any scriptures.
          It  behooves errantists-non-literalists- then  to face the facts: no  divine  inspiration and hope and a  utter  s and an utter disregard of truth inheres in that  work. They then  are so  oburate that they blaspheme themselves!
          And why would any  rational person expect other scriptures to have any relevance?

No comments:

Post a Comment